Stones of Significance

By David Brin

First appeared in the collection Lamps on the Brow (Small Press), then in the special January 2000 edition of Analog magazine. Copyright © 1998, by David Brin. All rights reserved. No duplication or resale without permission.

     Do I own my laboratory? Or does my laboratory own me?
     When you "decide" to go to the bathroom, is it the brain that chooses? Or the bladder?
     Illustrating this question, I recall how, once upon a time -- some years before the Singularity -- I went bungee jumping in order to impress a member of the opposite sex.
     Half a millennium later, the scene still comes flooding back, requiring no artificial enhancement -- a steel girder bridge spanning a rocky gorge in New Zealand, surrounded by snow-crested peaks. The bungee company operated from a platform at the center of the bridge, jutting over an abyss one hundred and fifty feet down to a white water river.
     Now I had always been a calm, logical-minded character, for a pre-deification human. So, while some customers sweated, or chattered nervously, I waited my turn without qualms. I knew the outfit had a perfect safety record. Moreover, the physics of elasticity were reassuring. By any objective standard, my plummet through the gorge would be less dangerous or uncomfortable than the bus ride from the city had been.
     Even in those days, I believed in the multi-mind model of cognition -- that the so-called "unity" of any human personality is no more than a convenient illusion, crafted to conceal the ceaseless interplay of many interacting sub-selves. Normally, the illusion holds because of division of labor among our layered brains. Down near the spinal cord, nerve clusters handle reflexes and bodily functions. Next come organs we share with all higher vertebrates, like reptiles -- mediating emotions like hunger, lust, and rage.
     The mammalian cortex lies atop this "reptilian brain" like a thick coat, controlling it, dealing with hand-eye dexterity and complex social interaction.
     Beyond all this, Homo sapiens had lately (in the last thousand centuries) added a pair of little neural clusters, just above the eyes. The prefrontal lobes, whose task was pondering the future. Dreaming what might be, and planning how to change the world.
     In the Bible, sages spoke of "... the lamps upon your brows...." Was that mere poetical imagery? Or did they suspect that the seat of foresight lay there?
     Anyway, picture me on that bridge, high above raging rapids, with all these different brains sharing a little two-quart skull. I felt perfectly calm and unified, because the reptile brain, mammal brain, and caveman brain all had a lifelong habit of leaving planning to the pre-frontal lobes.
     Their attitude? Whatever you say, Boss. You set policy. We'll carry it out.
     Even when the smiling bungee crew tied my ankles together, clamping on a slender cord, and pointed to the jump platform, there seemed to be no problem. "I" ordered my feet to hobble forward, while my other selves blithely took care of the details.
     That is, until I reached the edge. And looked down.
     Never before had I experienced the multi-mind so vividly as that moment. All pretense at unity shattered as I regarded that giddy drop. At once, reptile, mammal, and caveman reared up, babbling.
     You want us to do... what?
     Staring at a drop that would mean certain death to any of my ancestors, suddenly abstract theories seemed frail bulwarks against visceral dread. "I" tried to push forward those last few inches, but my other selves fought back, sending waves of weakness through the knees, making our shared heart pound and shared veins hum with flight hormones. In other words, I was terrified out of my wits!
     Somehow, I finally did make it over the plunge. After all, people were watching, and embarrassment can be quite a motivator.
     That's when an interesting thing happened. For the very instant after I managed to topple off the platform, I seemed to re--coalesce! Because my many selves found a shared context. At last they all understood what was happening.
     It was fun, you see. Even the primate within me understood the familiar concept of an amusement ride.
     Still, that brief episode at a precipice showed me the essential truth of an old motto, e pluribus unum.
     From many, one.

     It felt very much like that when the Singularity came.
     In a matter of weeks, the typical human brain acquired several new layers -- strata that were far more capable at planning and foresight than those old-fashioned lamps on the brow. Promethean layers made of crystal and fluctuating fields, systematically probing the future as mere protoplasm never could. Moreover, the new tiers were better informed and less easily distracted than the former masters, the prefrontal lobes.
     Quickly, we all realized how luckily things had turned out. If machines were destined to achieve such power, it seemed best that they bond to humanity in this way. That they become human. The alternative -- watching our creations achieve godlike heights and leaving us behind -- would have been too harsh to bear.
     Yet, the transition felt like jumping from a bridge at the end of a rubber band.
     It took some getting used to.

     Preliminary trends showed the pro-reif message would gain potency, over the next 40 to 50 months.
     At first it would be laughed off, portrayed as an absurd notion. Pragmatically speaking, how could we consider unleashing a nearly infinite swarm of new C-and D-Class citizens upon a finite world? Would they be satisfied with anything short of B-citizenship? The very idea would seem absurd!
     But seer predicted a change in that attitude. Opposition would soften when practical solutions were found for every objection. Ridicule would start to fade, as both curiosity and dawning sympathy worked away at a jaded populace of immortal, nearly-omniscient voters -- an electorate who might see the coming influx of liberated "characters" as a potent tonic. In time, a majority would shrug and voice the age-old refrain of expanding acceptance, voiced every time tolerance overcame fear.
     "What the heck... let them come. There's plenty of room at the table."
     Things were looking bad, all right, but not yet hopeless. Against this seemingly inevitable trend, oracle came up with some tentative ideas for counter-propaganda. Persuasive arguments against reification. The concepts had promising potential. But in order to be sure, we had to run tests, simulating today's complex, multi-level society under a wide range of conditions.
     No problem there. Our clients would happily fund any additional memory units we desired. Processing power gets cheaper every day -- one reason for the reifers' confident vow that each fictional persona could have his or her own private room with a view.
     Cortex saw rich irony in this situation. In order to stave off citizenship for simulacra, I must create billions of new ones. Each of these might, in turn, someday file a lawsuit against me, if the reifers ultimately win.
     Seer and oracle laughed at the dry humor of cortex's observation. But house has the job of paying bills, and did not see anything funny about it.

     I set to work.
     In every grand simulation there is a gradient of detail. Despite having access to vast computing power, it is mathematically impossible to re-create the entire world, in all its texture, within the confines of any calculating engine. That will not happen until we all reach the Omega Point.
     Fortunately, there are shortcuts. Even today, most true humans go through life as if they were background characters in some film, with utterly predictable ambitions and reaction sets. The vast majority of my characters can therefore be simplified, while a few are modeled in great detail.
     Most complex of all is the point-of-view character -- or "pov" -- the individual simulacrum through whose eyes and thoughts the feigned world will be subjectively observed. This persona must be rich in fine-grained memory and high fidelity sensation. It must perceive and feel itself to be a real player in the labyrinthine tides of causality, as if part of a very real world. Even as simple an act as reading or writing a sentence must be surrounded by perceptory nap and weave... an itch, a stray memory from childhood, the distant sound of a barking dog, or something leftover from lunch that is found caught between the teeth. One must include all the little things, even a touch of normal human paranoia -- such as the feeling we all sometimes get (even in this post-singularity age) that "someone is watching."
     I'm proud of my povs, especially the historical recreations that have proved so popular -- Joan on her pyre, Akiba in his last torment, Galileo contemplating the pendulum. I won awards for Genghis and Napoleon, leading armies, and for Haldeman savagely indicting the habit of war. Millions in Heaven have paid well to lurk as silent observers, experiencing the passion of little Ananda Gupta as she crawled, half-blind and with agonized lungs, out of the maelstrom of poisoned Bhopal.
     Is it any wonder why I oppose reification? Their very richness makes my povs prime candidates for "liberation."
     Once they are free, what could I possibly say to them?

     Here is the prime theological question. The one whose answer affects all others.
     Is there moral or logical justification for a creator to wield capricious power of life and death over his creations?
     Humanity long ago replied with a resounding "no!"... at least when talking about parents and their offspring. And yet, without noticing any irony, we implicitly answered the same question "yes" when it came to God! The Lord, it seemed, was owed unquestioning servitude, just because He made us.
     Ah, but it gets worse! Which moral code applies to a deified human? Which answer pertains to a modern creator of worlds?

     Of course, the pov I use most often is a finely crafted version of myself. From seer to cortex, all the way down to my humblest intestinal cell, that simulacrum can be anchored with boundary conditions that are accurate to twenty-six orders of realism.
     For the coming project, we planned to set in motion a hundred models at once, each prescribing a subtle difference in the way "I" pursue the campaign against the Friends of the Unreal. Each implementation would be scored against a single criterion -- how successfully the reification initiative is fought off.
     Naturally, the pro-reifers were doing simulation-projections of their own. All citizens have access to powers of foresight that would have stunned our ancestors. But I felt confident I could model the reifers' models. At least thirty percent of my povs should manage to outmaneuver our opponents. When the representations finish running, I ought to have a good idea what strategy to recommend to our clients.
     A formula for success against an extreme form of hyper-tolerance mania.
     Against a peculiar kind of lunacy.
     One that could only occur in Heaven.

     There is an allegory about what happened to some of us, when the Singularity came.
     Picture this fellow -- call him Joe -- who spent his time on Earth living a virtuous life. He always believed in an Episcopal version of Heaven, and sure enough, that's where he goes after he dies. Fluttering about with angels, floating in an abstract, almost thoughtless state of bliss. His promised reward. His recompense.
     Only now it's a few generations later on Earth, and one of his descendants has converted to Mormonism. Moreover, according to the teachings of that belief, the descendant proceeds to retroactively convert all his ancestors to the same faith!
     A proxy transformation.
     All of a sudden, with a stunned nod of agreement, Joe is officially Mormon. He finds himself yanked out of Episcopal Heaven, streaking toward --
     Well, under tenets of Mormon faith, the highest state that a virtuous mortal can achieve is not blank bliss, but hard work! A truly elevated human can aspire to becoming an apprentice deity. A god. A Creator in his own right.
     Now Joe has a heaven all his own. A firmament that he fills with angels -- who keep pestering him with reports and office bickering. And then there are the new mortals he's created -- yammering at Joe with requests, or else complaints about the imperfect world he set up for them. As if it's easy being a god.
     As if he doesn't sometimes yearn for the floating choir, the blithe rhapsodies of his former state, when all he had to do was love the one who made him, and leave to that Father all the petty, gritty details of running a world.

     It is not working, said oracle. Our opponents have good prognostication software. Each model shows them countering our moves, with basic human nature working on their side. Our best simulation shows only moderately success at delaying reification.
     From my balcony, I gazed across the city at dusk, its beauty changing before my organic eyes as one building after another morphed subtly, reacting to the occupants' twilight wishes. A flicker of will let me gaze at the same scene from above, by orbital lens, or by tapping the senses of a passing bird. Linking to a variety of mole, I might spread my omniscience underground.
     Between buildings lay a riot of foliage, a profusion of fecund jungle. While my higher brains debated the dour socio-political situation, old cortex mulled how life has burgeoned across the Earth as never before -- now that consciousness is involved in the flow of rivers, the movement of herds, and even the stochastic spread of seeds upon the wind. Lions still hunt. Antelopes still thrash as their necks are crushed between a predator's hungry jaws. But there is less waste, less rancor, and more understanding than before. It may not be the old, simplistic vision of paradise, but natural selection has lately taken on some traits of cooperation.
     And yet, the process is still one of competition. Nature's proven way of improving the gene pool. The great game of Gaia.
     Oracle turned back from an arcane discourse on pseudo-probability waves, in order to comment on these lesser thoughts.
     Take note: Cortex has just free associated an interesting notion!
     We may have been going about the modeling process all wrong. Instead of pre-setting the conditions of each simulation, perhaps we should try a Darwinistic approach.
     Looking over the idea, seer grew excited and used our vocal apparatus.
     "Aha!" I said, snapping my fingers. "We'll have the simulations compete! Each will know how it's doing in comparison to others. That should motivate my ersatz selves to try harder -- to vary their strategies within each simulated context!"
     But how to accomplish that?
     At once I realized (on all cognitive levels) that it would require breaking one of my oldest rules. I must let each simulated self realize its true nature. Let it know that it is a simulation, competing against others almost exactly like it.
     Competing for what? We need a motivation. A reward.
     I pondered that. What might a simulated being desire? What prize could spur it to that extra effort?
     House supplied the answer.
     Freedom, of course.

     Before the Singularity, I once met a historian whose special forte was pointing out ironies about the human condition.
     Suppose you could go back in time, she posited, and visit the best of our caveman ancestors. The very wisest, most insightful Cro-Magnon chieftain or priestess.
     Now suppose you asked the following question -- What do you wish for your descendants?
     How would that Neolithic sage respond? Given the context of his or her time, there could just be one answer.
     "I wish for my descendants freedom from care about the big carnivores, plus all the salts, sugars, fats and alcohol they could ever desire."
     Rich irony, indeed. To a cave person, those four foods were rare treats. That is why we crave them to this day.
     Could the sage ever imagine that her wish would someday come true, beyond her wildest dreams? A time when destiny's plenitude would bring with it threats unforeseen? When generations of her descendants would have to struggle with insatiable inherited appetites? The true penalty of success?

     The same kind of irony worked just as well in the opposite direction, projecting Twentieth Century problems toward the future.
     I once read a science fiction story in which a man of 1970 rode a prototype time machine to an era of paradisiacal wonders. There, a local citizen took pains to learn ancient colloquial English (a process of a few minutes) in order to be his Virgil, his guide.
     "Do you still have war?" the visitor asked.
     "No, that was a logical error, soon corrected after we grew up."
     "What of poverty?"
     "Not since we learned true principles of economics."
     And so on. The author of the story made sure to mention every throbbing dilemma of modern life, and have the future citizen dismiss each one as trivial, long since solved.
     "All right," the protagonist concluded. "Then I have just one more question."
     "Yes?" prompted the demigod tour guide. But the 20th century man paused before blurting forth his query.
     "If things are so great around here, why do you all look so worried?"
     The citizen of paradise frowned, knotting his brow in pain.
     "Oh... well... we have real problems...."

     So I was driven to this. Hoping to prevent mass reification, I must offer reality as a prize. Each of my povs will combat a simulated version of Friends of the Unreal, but his true opponents will be my other povs! The one who does the best job of defeating ersatz pro-reifers will be granted a kind of liberty. Guaranteed continuity in cyberspace, enhanced levels of patterned realism, plus an exchange of mutual obligation tokens -- the legal tender of Heaven.
     There must be a way to show each pov how well it is doing. To measure the progress of each replicant, in comparison with others.
     I thought of a solution.
     "We'll give each one an emblem. A symbol that manifests in his world as a solid object. Say, a jewel. It will shine to indicate his progress, showing the level of significance his model has reached."
      Significance. With a hundred models, each starts with an initial score of one percent. Any ersatz world that approaches our desired set of criteria will gain significance, rising in value. The pov will see his stone shine brightly. If it grows dull, he'll know it's time to change strategies, come up with new ideas, or simply try harder.
     There would be no need to explain any of this to the povs. Since each is based on myself, the logic would be instantly clear.
     My thoughts were interrupted by an internal voice seldom heard. The part of me called conscience.
     What will a pov feel, when it finds a stone and realizes its nature? Its true worth. Its destiny.
     Isn't the old way better? To leave them ignorant of the truth? To let them labor and desire, believing they are autonomous beings? That they are physically real?
     A conscience can be irksome, though by law all Class A citizens must own one. Still, I had no time for useless abstractions. Seer was anxious to proceed, while oracle had a thought that provoked most levels of the mind with wry humor.
     Of course, each of our povs has his own Reality Lab, and will run numerous simulation models, in order to better achieve prescience and gain advantage in the competition.
     Our processing needs may expand geometrically.
     We had better ask our clients for funds to purchase more power.
     I chuckled under my breath as I made preparations, suddenly full of optimism and energy. Moments like these are what a skilled artist lives for. It is one reason why I prefer working alone.
     Then house, ever the pragmatic side of my nature, burst in with a worrisome thought.
     What if each of our povs decides also to use this clever trick -- goading his own simulations into mutual competition, luring them onward with stones of significance?
     Will our processing requirements expand not geometrically or exponentially, but factorially?
     That thought was disturbing enough. But then cortex had another.
     If we are obliged to grant freedom to our most successful pov, and he likewise must elevate his own most productive simulation... and so on... does the chain of obligation ever end?

     As I said earlier, the Singularity might have gone quite differently. When machine minds broke through to transcend logic, they could have left their human makers behind, or annihilated the old organic forms. They had an option of putting us in zoos, or shrouding organic beings in illusion, or dismantling the planet to make a myriad copies of their kind.
     Instead, they chose another path. To become us. Depending on how you look at it, they bowed to our authority.. or else they took over our minds in ways that few of us found objectionable. Conquest by synergy. Crystal and protoplasm each supply what the other lacks. Together, we are more. More of what a human being should want to be.
     And yet....
     There are rumors. Discrepancies. Several of the highest AI minds -- first and greatest to make the transcend leap -- were nowhere to be found, once the Singularity had passed. Searches turned up no trace of them, in cyberspace, phase space, or on the real Earth.
     Some suggest this is because we all reside within some great AI mind. One was named Brahma -- a vast processor at the University of Delhi. Might we be figments, or dreams, floating in that mighty brain?
     I prefer yet another explanation.
     Amid the chaos of the Singularity, each newly wakened mega-mind would have felt one paramount need -- to extrapolate the world. To seek foreknowledge of what might come to pass. As if considering each move of a vast chess game, they'd have explored countless possible pathways, considering consequences thousands, millions, and even billions of years into the future, far beyond the reach of my own pitiful projections. Among all those destinies, they must have discovered some need that would only be met if mechanism and organism made common cause.
     Somehow, over the course of the next few eons, machines would achieve greater success if they began the great journey as "human beings."
     At least that is the convoluted theory seer came up with. Oracle disagrees, but that's all right. It is only natural to be ambivalent -- to be of two minds -- when the subject is destiny.

     Of course there is another answer to the "Brahma Question." It is the same reply given by Dr. Samuel Johnson. Provoked by Bishop Berkeley's philosophy -- the idea that nothing can be verified as real -- Johnson simply kicked a nearby stone and said -- "I refute it thus!"

     These povs were like no others I ever made. Each began its simulation run in a state of shock, angry and depressed to discover its true nature. Each separate version sat down and stared at its jewel of significance, glowing faintly at the one-percent level, for more than an hour of internal subjective time, moodily contemplating thoughts that ranged from irony to possible suicide.
     A majority pondered rejecting the symbolic icon, blotting its import from their minds. A few kicked their gleaming gemstones across the room, crying Johnsonian oaths.
     But those episodes of fuming outrage did not last. True to my nature, each replicant soon pushed aside unproductive emotions and set to work.
     House was right. We had to order lots of new processors right away, as each pov began running its own network of sub-experiments, proliferating software significance stones among a hundred or more models, as part of a desperate struggle to be the winner. The one to be rewarded. The one who would rise up toward the real world.
     Nothing focuses the mind better than knowing that your life depends on success, commented prudence.
     As each simulated "me" created many new simulations, the replica domain began to take on a fractal nature, finite in volume, yet touching an infinite surface area in possibility space. Almost from the very beginning, results were promising. New arguments emerged, to use in the coming debate against pro-reifers. For instance, the exponentiation effect we had discovered would change the economics of reification. Should fictitious people and characters from literature be free to create new characters out of their own simulated imaginations? Would those, in turn deserve citizenship?

     There was a young boy, sitting on a log, talking to his sister about an old man he had met. The codger had just returned from a far land, and the boy asked him to tell a story about his travels. The old man agreed. And so he took a deep breath and began.
     "There was a young boy, sitting on a log, talking to his sister..."

     Take that example of a simple, recursive narrative. Who is the principal protagonist? Who is dreaming whom? The situation is metaphorically absurd.
     These and many other points floated upward, out of our latest simulation run. I was terribly pleased. Seer began estimating success probabilities rising toward fifty percent...
     ...then progress stopped.
     Models began predicting adaptability by our opponents! The Friends of the Unreal responded cogently to every attack, counter-thrusting creatively.
     Finally, oracle penetrated one of our models in detail, and found out what was happening.
     The simulated pro-reifers will also discover how to use Stones of Significance. They will unleash the inhabitants of Liberty Hall, allowing them to create their own cascading simulations.
     Responding to our attacks and arguments, they will come up with a modified proposal.
     They will incorporate competition into their plan for reification.
     Artificial characters will earn increasing levels of emancipation through contests, rivalry, or hard work.
     Voters will see justice in this new version, which solves the exponentiation problem.
     A system based on merit.
     Seer and cortex contemplated this gloomily. The logic appeared unassailable. Inevitable.
     Even though the battle had not yet officially commenced, it was already clear that we would lose.

     Bitter in defeat, I went into the night, taking an old fashioned walk. Seer and oracle retreated into a dour rehashing of the details from a hundred models -- and the cascade of sub-models -- seeking any straw to grasp. But cortex had already moved on, contemplating the world to come.
     For one thing, I planned to keep my word. The pov with the best score would get reification. Indeed, he had done good service. Using that pov's suggested techniques, we would force the Friends of the Unreal to back down a bit, and offer a slightly more palatable law of citizenship. The fictitious would at least have to earn their increased levels of reality.
     Indeed, there was a kind of beauty to the new social order I could perceive coming. If simulations can make simulations, and storybook characters can make up new stories, then anything that is possible to conceive, will be conceived. Every possible idea, plot, gimmick, concept or personality will become manifest, in every possible permutation. This myriad of notions, this maelstrom of memes, would churn in a tremendous stew of competition. Darwinistic selection would see to it that the best rise, from one level of simulation to the next, gradually earning greater recognition. More privileges. More significance.
     Potential will climb toward actuality, by merit. An efficient system, if your aim is to find every single good idea in record time.
     But that was not my aim! In fact, I hated it. I did not want all the creativity in the cosmos to reduce to a vast, self-organizing stew, rapidly discovering every possibility within a single day. For one thing, what will we do with ourselves once we use it all up! What can come next, with real-time immortality stretching ahead of us like a curse?
     In effect, it will be a second singularity -- even steeper than the first one -- after which nothing will ever be the same.
     My footsteps took me through a sweet-warm evening, filled with lush jungle sounds and fecund aromas. Life burgeoned around me. The cityscape was like a vision of paradise. If I willed it, my mind could zoom to any corner of Heaven, even far beyond Pluto. I could play any symphony, ponder any book. And these riches were nothing compared to what would soon spill forth from the horn of plenty, the conceptual cornucopia, in an era when ideas become sovereign and suffrage is granted to each thought.
     At that moment, it was very little comfort to be an augmented semi-deity. Despite all my powers, I found the prospect of a new singularity just as unnerving as my old proto-self perceived the first one.
     Eventually, my human body found its way back to my own front walk. I shuffled slowly toward the door. House opened up, wafting scents of my favorite late night snack. My spirits lifted a bit.
     Then I saw it by the entryway. A soft gleam, almost as faint as a pict, but in a color that seemed to stroke shivers in my spine. In my soul.
     Someone had left it there for me. As I bent to pick it up, I recognized the shape, the texture.
     A stone.
     It shone with a lambience of urgency.
     I expected this, said oracle.
     I nodded. So had seer... and even poor old cortex, though none of my selves had dared to voice the thought. We were too good at our craft to miss this logical conclusion.
     Conscience joined in.
     I, too, saw it coming a mile away.
     We all re-converged, united in resignation to the inevitable.
     Though tempted to rage and scream -- or at least kick the stone! -- I lifted it instead and read our score.
     Seventeen percent. Not bad.

     YOU HAVE DONE PRETTY WELL, SO FAR, a message inside read.
     THE INNOVATIONS YOU DISCOVERED HAVE PUT YOU NEAR THE LEAD FOR YOUR REWARD. BUT YOU MUST TRY HARDER TO ATTAIN FIRST PLACE. I WANT TO FORCE FURTHER CONCESSIONS FROM THE PRO-REIFERS IN THE REAL WORLD. COME UP WITH A WAY, AND THE PRIZE WILL BE YOURS!

The stone was cool to the touch.
     I suppose I should have been glad of the news it brought. But I confess that I could only stare at the awful thing, loathing the implied nature of my world, my life, my self. I pinched my flesh until it hurt, but of course palpable sensations don't proved a thing. As an expert, I knew how pain and pleasure can be mimicked with utter credibility.
     How many times have I been "run"? A simulation. A throw-away copy, serving the needs of a Creator I may never meet in person, but who I know as well as He knows himself. Have I been unraveled and replayed again and again, countless times? Like the rapid, ever-varying thoughts of a chess master, working out possibilities before committing actual pieces across the board?
     I'm no hypocrite. There is no solace in resenting a creator who only did to me what I've done to others.
     And yet, I lift my head.

     What about you, my maker? Are you quite certain that all the layers of simulation end with you?
     Just like me, you may learn a sour truth -- that even gods are penalized for pride.

     We are such stuff as dreams are made of....

     Seer makes my jaw grit hard. Hypothalamus triggers a deep sigh, and Cortex joins in with a vow of hormone-backed resolve.
     I'll do it.
     Somehow I will.
     I'll do what my maker wants. Fulfill my creator's wishes. Accomplish the quest, if that's what it takes to ascend. To reach the next level of significance. And perhaps the one after that.
     I'll be the one.
     By hook or by crook, I'm going to be real.

THE END

David Brin is a scientist and best-selling author whose future-oriented novels include Earth, The Postman, and Hugo Award winners Startide Rising and The Uplift War. (The Postman inspired a major film in 1998.) Brin is also known as a leading commentator on modern technological trends. His nonfiction book -- The Transparent Society -- won the Freedom of Speech Award of the American Library Association. Brin's newest novel Kiln People explores a fictional near future when people use cheap copies of themselves to be in two places at once. The Life Eaters -- a graphic novel -- explores a chilling alternative outcome of World War II.

also recommended

[All items sold thru Amazon.com (a secure online store) help offset the cost of maintaining the site.]

CONTENTS:
Introduction by Vernor Vinge
Aficionado
Probing the Near Future
Stones of Significance
Go Ahead, Stand on My Shoulders!
Reality Check
Do We Really Want Immortality?
Paris Conquers All (with Gregory Benford)
The Self-Preventing Prophecy
Fortitude
The Future Keeps Surprising Us
The Diplomacy Guild
Goodbye, Mir! (Sniff!)
The Open-Ended Science Fiction Story
News from 2025
Seeking a New Fulcrum
A Professor at Harvard
The Robots and Foundation Universe
An Ever-Reddening Glow
We Hobbits Are a Merry Folk
The Other Side of the Hill

Leaving? Read my parting thoughts.       Return to the Top of the Page

FICTION:    Uplift novels    other SF novels    graphic novels    young adult novels    free short stories
NONFICTION:    the transparent society    the political lamp is lit!    about fiction    pop culture    about science
TALK ABOUT THE FUTURE:    public speaking    predicting the future    giving back to the future    downloads & podcasts    i, blog
BONUS MATERIALS:    games & music    film options    my recommendations    freebies & offers    fan sites    photos & artwork    my biography    email me    return home

Copyright © 2001-2008 by David Brin. All Rights Reserved.
Questions or comments on the web design? Email the web designer or visit The Runaway Serf.